Model-based mutation testing via symbolic refinement checking
نویسندگان
چکیده
In model-based mutation testing, a test model is mutated for test case generation. The resulting test cases are able to detect whether the faults in the mutated models have been implemented in the system under test. For this purpose, a conformance check between the original and the mutated model is required. The generated counterexamples serve as basis for the test cases. Unfortunately, conformance checking is a hard problem and requires sophisticated verification techniques. Previous attempts using an explicit conformance checker suffered state space explosion. In this paper, we present several optimisations of a symbolic conformance checker using constraint solving techniques. The tool efficiently checks the refinement between non-deterministic test models. Compared to previous implementations, we could reduce our runtimes by 97%. In a new industrial case study, our optimisations can reduce the runtime from over 6 hours to less than 3 minutes.
منابع مشابه
Towards Symbolic Model-Based Mutation Testing: Combining Reachability and Refinement Checking
Model-based mutation testing uses altered test models to derive test cases that are able to reveal whether a modelled fault has been implemented. This requires conformance checking between the original and the mutated model. This paper presents an approach for symbolic conformance checking of action systems, which are well-suited to specify reactive systems. We also consider nondeterminism in o...
متن کاملHabilitationsschrift Model-Based Mutation Testing: Theory and Application
In this habilitation thesis we present our research on model-based mutation testing. Mutation testing is a way of assessing and improving a test suite by checking if its test cases can detect a number of injected faults in a program. The faults are introduced by syntactically changing the source code of a program. In our work we generalise mutation testing from program testing to modelbased tes...
متن کاملConformance Checking of Real-Time Models - Symbolic Execution vs. Bounded Model Checking
Abstract. We compare conformance checking based on symbolic execution to conformance checking via bounded model checking. The application context is fault-based test case generation, focusing on realtime faults. The existing bounded model checking approach is performed on timed automata. It supports time-relevant mutation operators and a preprocessing functionality for removing silent transitio...
متن کاملBehavioral Composition in Symbolic Domains
We report preliminary results toward a framework for composing behavioral models. In our framework, models arise from a variety of description techniques such as state machines or scenarios given by textual and diagrammatic notations. Such models may describe full system behavior or aspects of system behavior representing a given concern. Our models may be composed with each other and transform...
متن کاملSplitting Trees and Partition Refinement in Real-Time Model Checking
This paper discusses model checking of real-time systems. A novel aspect of our approach is the unconventional approach to deal with representing symbolic state spaces. The representation does not use a canonical form for representing symbolic nodes. Instead it applies an alternative representation based on splitting trees. Unlike often used canonical representations, this representation is tai...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Sci. Comput. Program.
دوره 97 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015